What is the Downside of Using the Traditional Waterfall Approach?
As a matter of fact, the traditional waterfall approach to systems design and analysis was the very first launched modern approach to system building. It is nothing but a sequential project management strategy that takes a linear approach to development. Under the waterfall methodology, most stakeholder requirements and project deliverables are stated right at the beginning and then documented in a rigorous development plan. In addition, when it comes to the waterfall model, every stage of a project often relies on the deliverables from the previous stage. Even though there are a lot of benefits to using the waterfall model for your project, there are disadvantages too. Have a look at the advantages of waterfall development before you get into its downsides which are given below.
Advantages of Waterfall Methodology
The agile waterfall model has been developed with unique and powerful benefits that can be effective for your projects which are as follows:
Organizing is the Operations
The waterfall methodology emphasizes a clear work structure by focusing on a specific and defined set of phases. Before going on to the next stage, teams should accomplish the whole phase. Hence, obstacles to completion are clearly and instantly visible if any.
One of the features of the waterfall model is the clear determination of objectives to be attained right from the scratch. This further offers clarity to the whole team and enables them to operate more efficiently while keeping the end goal in mind.
Making Follow-up Easier
Moreover, this strategy lets you see the project's progress in a simple and clear manner. It also indicates that no special training or certification is needed at the project management level.
Enhancing Traceability and Communication
Being that waterfall development is methodical by definition, it implies that it is developed based on standardized procedures that facilitate accurate and efficient communication of project details. Also, the transfer of data should be accurate and documented to develop each project phase properly.
Downsides of Using the Hybrid Waterfall Approach with Agile
Being waterfall model one of the trusted and well-known project management methodologies, they cover Scrum, Agile, Kanban, and Six Sigma comfortably. However, it also has several downsides when you use it for the purpose of project development which is right below:
Exclusion of End User or Client
As the waterfall methodology is an internal process, it does not focus much on the customers or end-users involved in a project. But, customers usually want to participate in a project for clarifying their needs and adding feedback.
Difficulty in Making Alterations
When this model is in its traditional form, it never gives space for unexpected revisions or alterations. An unexpected change in project criteria could render most of your work so far meaningless, leading to a delayed deadline.
Conducts Testing After the Project Completion
It is quite risky to leave the testing phase for last in any project development. Sometimes, the project takes a long time to complete and make revisions using the waterfall methodology which thereby results in a delayed testing phase.
Looking for developer team, please contact us at : https://www.vyomsolutions.com/contact